7 B2B positioning lessons for the age of AI from CMO Huddles Strategy Labs
June 30, 2026

7 B2B Positioning Lessons for the Age of AI

by Melissa Caffrey

Quick summary: B2B positioning strategy requires seven things in the age of AI: A named problem, not a tagline. A clear animal (lion, not hamster or pigeon). Consistent language across every channel. CEO sponsorship. The courage to say no. A position that works before buyers contact you. And the discipline to hold it for 12 to 18 months while it compounds.

B2B positioning has always mattered. AI has upped the urgency.

For most of the last two decades, weak positioning was expensive but survivable. A company without a clear market stance could still win deals on product quality, relationships, or price. Buyers did their own research. Sales teams filled the gaps. The story could be clarified in a meeting.

That model is changing. Buyers increasingly use AI to research, evaluate, and shortlist vendors before they ever contact a sales team. The AI forms an opinion about your company from whatever it can find. If your positioning is fuzzy, inconsistent, or indistinguishable from your competitors, the AI will reflect that fuzziness back to your buyers, and the conversation may be over before it begins.

CMO Huddles ran positioning Strategy Labs across multiple cities with two of the most experienced B2B positioning practitioners working today:

  • Bob Wright, co-founder of Firebrick Consulting, has led more than 300 B2B positioning engagements including GitLab, Workday, Calendly, and Postman.
  • Ellie Victor, CEO of ZOOM Marketing, has spent her career helping B2B companies diagnose positioning problems and fix them.

Together, their sessions produced seven lessons that apply to every B2B CMO navigating positioning in the age of AI.

1. Most B2B Companies Have a Tagline, Not a B2B Positioning Strategy

This is the lesson both experts named first, and it is the one that surprised the most CMOs in the room. When asked whether their company had a genuine market position, fewer than half raised their hand. Most had messaging. Many had a brand voice. Almost none had a market stance.

A tagline describes what you do. A position stakes a claim on why it matters, who it is for, and what is different about your approach. The difference is not semantic. A company that has staked a clear position on a named problem has something to build content authority around. A company that leads only with a tagline does not.

“Have a viewpoint. Own a problem. Take a corner of the room. If you’re bunched in the middle of the category, the buyer either goes with the brand-name player or makes no decision at all.”— Bob Wright, Co-Founder, Firebrick Consulting

Victor frames the diagnostic simply: Ask your leadership team what category the company is in and what it stands for. If you get different answers, you do not have a positioning problem. You have a strategy problem wearing a positioning costume.

The AI dimension compounds this. When a buyer asks an LLM to compare vendors in a category, the AI describes each company based on whatever signals it can find. A company with a genuine market position gives the AI something distinctive to work with. A company with only a tagline gives it generic language that could apply to anyone in the category.

2. The Animal Test Is the Fastest B2B Positioning Diagnostic Available

Victor opens her positioning sessions with a diagnostic that cuts through weeks of messaging workshops in about ten minutes. She calls it the animal test. Every B2B company, she argues, is behaving like one of three animals.

The hamster is in constant motion. Fast, energetic, executing well, but running on a wheel without moving the positioning needle. Lots of campaigns, lots of content, lots of activity. The hamster may be well-run organizationally, but has not yet staked a distinctive claim in the market.

The pigeon has broad reach and reliable presence. It shows up consistently, it gets the word out, it covers a lot of ground. But it blends into the category. In a competitive evaluation, it is hard to tell the pigeon from three others doing similar things.

The lion owns territory. It has defined a specific problem, built authority in that space, and is recognizable as the go-to resource for a particular kind of buyer with a particular kind of challenge.

The value of the test is not that everyone should become a lion. It is that you need to know which animal you are and make deliberate choices based on that understanding. A company that is intentionally positioned like a pigeon for strategic reasons is in a fundamentally better place than a company that thinks it is a lion but is actually a hamster.

“Most companies come to me as hamsters or pigeons. The work is to figure out which lion they could be — and then have the courage to commit to it.”— Ellie Victor, CEO, ZOOM Marketing

The AI dimension is relevant here not because one animal is inherently more visible to LLMs than another (as far as we know), but because clarity and specificity produce more consistent content signals. A company with a clearly defined position, whatever form that takes, will generate more coherent content across its website, its team’s LinkedIn profiles, and its partner mentions than a company whose positioning is genuinely unclear even to its own leadership.

3. You Cannot Own a Position Until You Have Named the Problem

Wright’s single most consistent observation across every city and every engagement: The companies that win in B2B are the companies that name the problem their buyers feel, not the product they have built.

Naming the problem is a strategic act. It means giving the pain point a label that is specific enough to be recognizable and broad enough to resonate across your ICP. The margin erosion zone. The acceleration gap. The payment complexity trap. These are not just memorable phrases. They are claims on a category conversation. The company that names the problem owns the conversation, even when competitors try to copy the language.

The practical implication for most B2B companies is counterintuitive: Do not spend energy naming your category. Analysts will name the category. Spend your energy naming the problem. Categories are shared. Problems can be owned.

“Buyers buy from pain and problems. Name the problem, not the category, not the product. The company that names the problem owns the conversation.”— Bob Wright, Co-Founder, Firebrick Consulting

The AI dimension is significant. AI tools are trained on language. When an LLM looks for sources to cite on a topic, it is looking for the content that most clearly and authoritatively addresses the question a buyer is asking. A company that has named a problem and built consistent content around that named problem will be cited when buyers ask about it. A company that has not named the problem will be subsumed into generic category descriptions, if it appears at all.

Wright applies this specifically to AI positioning, where the stakes are particularly high right now. “‘AI-powered’ is not differentiation. It’s just more noise,” he says. The companies that will win the AI positioning conversation are the ones that name what their AI does that is specific and different, and what proprietary data or capability makes that possible. That is a problem-naming exercise, not a feature-labeling one.

4. Positioning Is a Leadership Test, Not a Marketing Project

Both Wright and Victor named this independently, and it is where most positioning projects fail. A CMO who treats positioning as a marketing deliverable will produce a marketing deliverable. A CMO who treats it as a company initiative will produce something that actually changes how the company competes.

The difference is executive sponsorship. Wright is blunt about this: If the CEO is not in the room and accountable for the output, do not start. Not because the CMO is not capable, but because positioning done right forces strategic choices that marketing alone does not have the authority to make, like:

  • What problem does this company own?
  • What buyer does it serve above all others?
  • What does it say no to?

Victor sees the same pattern from a different angle. The most common reason positioning projects fail is not strategic weakness. It is organizational resistance. The sales team has its own message. The product team has its own roadmap. The CEO has a mental model that has not been updated since the founding story. A positioning process that does not engage all three will produce a story that marketing believes in and nobody else uses.

⚠️  If you cannot get the CEO to sponsor the positioning process, do not rebrand the presentation deck and call it positioning. That is the most common and most expensive form of positioning theater in B2B marketing.

The AI dimension compounds this. Every piece of content your company produces, every employee LinkedIn post, every partner mention, every analyst citation contributes to the AI’s model of what your company is and does. If the CEO, the CMO, the CRO, and the product team are all saying different things, the AI will average out the incoherence into a muddled picture. Internal alignment is not just good governance. It is an AEO requirement.

5. Saying No Is the Hardest and Most Important Part

Every category leader Wright has studied has one thing in common beyond a clear viewpoint: They have said no to something significant. A buyer segment they chose not to serve. A use case they chose not to claim. A feature they chose not to build. The no is what makes the yes meaningful.

Victor’s animal test surfaces this dynamic differently. A company that is trying to be all things to all buyers—the hamster running without strategic direction, or the pigeon spreading across the whole category without distinctive territory—has not yet made the commitment that a distinctive position requires.

This is where the most friction appears. The instinct is to hedge. To keep the positioning broad enough that it does not alienate any segment. To add qualifications and caveats until the point of view disappears.

“Ask yourself: iI the buying criteria was based on these three capabilities, we’d win every single time. What are those? Build the case that those are exactly the right criteria.”— Bob Wright, Co-Founder, Firebrick Consulting

Wright’s counsel here is direct: “If you’re bunched in the middle of the category, the buyer either goes with the brand-name player or makes no decision at all.” The middle is not safe. It is where companies go to be ignored. The companies that have made a real positioning commitment—that have named a specific problem and built the buying criteria around their unique ability to solve it—are the ones that win the category conversation rather than competing in it.

6. Your B2B Positioning Strategy Must Work Before a Buyer Contacts You

This is the synthesis insight that neither expert’s individual sessions state explicitly, but that emerges from putting both frameworks together. Positioning has always needed to work in the market. AI has moved the moment when it needs to work.

In the pre-AI buying journey, a company had multiple touchpoints to clarify and reinforce its position: The website, the sales deck, the first meeting, the demo, the proposal. A buyer who was confused after the website might get clarity from the SDR. A buyer who was unconvinced after the first call might be won over in a deeper technical conversation.

In the AI-assisted buying journey, the shortlist is often formed before any of those touchpoints. A buyer who uses an LLM to research solutions in a category will get a response that either includes your company with a clear, specific description of what you do and who you serve, or does not include you at all, or includes you in a muddled way that does not differentiate you from three competitors.

By the time the buyer contacts you, the AI has already done the positioning work. The question is whether it did it correctly, based on clear, consistent, authoritative signals from your company, or incorrectly, based on whatever incoherence it could find.

Victor’s animal test is a diagnostic for the internal state of your positioning. Wright’s five pillars are the architecture for building it. But the bar they are building to has changed. It is no longer enough for your positioning to work in a sales meeting. It has to work in an AI-generated response to a buyer who has not met you yet.

7. Positioning Is Not Code. Commit to It and Let It Compound.

Every positioning engagement Wright has run ends with the same counsel: Once you have the position, stay on it. Not forever, but for long enough for it to shape the market rather than just the next sales deck.

The pressure to iterate positioning is intense and usually comes from the wrong signals. A deal is lost. Someone in a customer conversation says the messaging was confusing. A competitor launches something that sounds similar. These are real signals, but they are not signals to change the position. They are signals to improve the activation, the training, and the consistency.

Wright’s guideline is 12 to 18 months before reconsidering a position. Not because markets do not move, but because positions do not compound unless they are held long enough to take root. A company that changes its positioning every six months never builds the authority that makes the position valuable.

“Positioning is not code. Don’t iterate it. Stick with it. Put a feedback loop in place with your CRO and look at patterns across at least a couple of quarters before you consider changing it.”— Bob Wright, Co-Founder, Firebrick Consulting

There is a practical implication for how AI tools describe your company over time. A company that has been consistently saying the same things about the same problem across its website, its team’s public presence, and third-party sources for 18 months has produced a much more consistent signal than a company that has repositioned multiple times in the same period. Consistency is not just a communications virtue. It is what determines whether your positioning accumulates into genuine authority or stays perpetually underdeveloped.

Victor frames the same point from the diagnostic angle: The lion does not change territory. It defends and expands the territory it has chosen. The commitment to the position is part of what makes it a position.

The Through Line

What these seven B2B positioning lessons share is an updated bar for what positioning needs to accomplish. It has always needed to be clear, distinctive, and consistently executed. The current buying environment adds a new requirement: it needs to be coherent enough across enough channels that it can be accurately represented in AI-generated descriptions of your company.

That is not a reason to approach positioning differently at the strategic level. Wright’s five pillars are the same pillars they have always been. Victor’s animal test is the same diagnostic. The work of staking a clear position on a named problem, getting executive alignment, and holding the story long enough for it to compound has not changed.

What has changed is the cost of getting it wrong. In a pre-AI buying journey, weak positioning was correctable by a good sales team. In a buying journey where AI tools increasingly shape the shortlist, weak positioning shows up in how your company is described before the sales team enters the conversation at all. The margin for muddled messaging has narrowed.

The companies that do this work now will not just have better marketing. They will have a structurally more coherent presence in a buying journey that their competitors are still trying to understand.

Want More?

Frequently Asked Questions About B2B Positioning Strategy

What is B2B positioning strategy and why does it matter more in the age of AI?

B2B positioning strategy is the set of choices that determine what problem your company owns, who it serves, and why buyers should choose it over alternatives. It matters more in the age of AI because LLMs now shape the shortlist before buyers contact a sales team. A company with a clear, distinctive position gets cited accurately in AI-generated research. A company without one gets described generically, or not at all.

What is the fastest way to diagnose a B2B positioning problem?

Ellie Victor’s animal test: Determine whether your company is a hamster (running hard with no strategic direction), a pigeon (blending in with every competitor), or a lion (owning a specific corner of the market). The faster diagnostic is to ask your CEO, CRO, and head of product to each describe the company’s position in one sentence. If you get three different answers, you do not have a messaging problem. You have a strategy problem.

How does AI change B2B positioning strategy?

AI changes the moment when positioning needs to work. In a pre-AI buying journey, positioning could be clarified in sales meetings. In an AI-assisted buying journey, the shortlist is often formed before any sales contact. LLMs describe companies to buyers based on whatever signals they can find. A clear, consistent, authoritative position produces a clear AI description. A muddled position produces a muddled one, or absence.

How long should a B2B positioning strategy last before it changes?

Bob Wright’s guideline is 12 to 18 months. Positioning does not compound unless it is held long enough to shape how the market talks about you. The pressure to iterate after a lost deal or a competitor move is usually misdiagnosed: The problem is activation and consistency, not the position itself. In the age of AI, this is even more important: LLMs reward companies that have been saying the same things about the same problem for long enough to have built genuine content authority.

What makes a B2B positioning strategy work in AI search?

Five things: A clearly named problem that buyers can recognize and search for. Consistent language used across your website, your team’s LinkedIn profiles, your partner content, and your press coverage. Depth of content on a focused topic rather than thin coverage across everything. FAQ sections and structured content that LLMs can parse and cite. And organizational alignment so that every touchpoint, human and machine, is reinforcing the same position.